brintellex
  • Users Online: 236
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 19-23

The role of fluoroscopically detected coronary calcium in predicting the presence of significant coronary lesions


Department of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jostol Pinto
2-2-109/4, The Crystal House, Ladyhill Main Road, Urwa Chilimbi, Mangalore - 575 006, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/JICC.JICC_12_20

Rights and Permissions

Context: Coronary artery disease (CAD) accounts for over 16' of deaths worldwide.[1] As part of its diagnosis and stratification of severity in a patient, a noninvasive modality would certainly be useful to triage CAD. Aims: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of fluoroscopically detected coronary artery calcification (CAC) as a tool to grade coronary stenosis. Settings and Design: Comparing severity of fluoroscopic CAC with a severity of CAD by coronary angiograms (CAGs) in a high-volume center. Subjects and Methods: Fluoroscopic presence of CAC was graded using the Yamanaka method and correlated with CAGs in 200 patients. Statistical Analysis Used: Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, Chi-squared tests for significance. Results: The overall prevalence of CAC was 43' varying with age, sex, and CAD severity. The most common location of CAC was the left anterior descending artery followed by right coronary artery. Fluoroscopic CAC had 94' specificity and 96.5' positive predictive value for significant stenosis, albeit lower sensitivity of 55.3'. While 63' of those patients with single-vessel CAC had multivessel CAD, 91' of those with multivessel CAC had multivessel CAD. CAC was detected as follows: 6' in minor CAD, 40' in single-vessel disease (VD), 64' in two- or three-VD, and 100' in those with four-VD (P = 0.001). CAC was seen in 69.6' of patients having chronic total occlusions (CTOs) while in only 32.6' without CTOs (P = 0.001). Conclusions: A strong relation is present between CAC and severity of CAD. CAC is not a good screening tool for CAD due to low sensitivity. Notably, multivessel CAC strongly predicts multivessel CAD.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed102    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded11    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal