|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 56-74
Twenty-four-hour blood pressure management in India: A position statement by Indian College of cardiology
PB Jayagopal1, BC Srinivas2, TR Raghu2, NN Khanna3, KH Srinivas2, SC Manchanda4, Shantanu Guha5, Saumitra Ray6, Joy M Thomas7, Sameer Srivastava8, Devanu Ghosh Roy9, Sadanand R Shetty10, I Sathyamoorthy11, KS Ravindranath2, Girish B Navasundi12, RR Mantri13, Peeyush Jain14, Amal Kumar Khan15
1 Director and Senior Interventional Cardiologist, Lakshmi Hospital, Palakkad, India
2 Cardiology, Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research Hospital, Bangalore, India
3 Professor of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Delhi, India
4 Senior Consultant cardiologist, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
5 Department of Cardiology, Medical College, Kolkata, India
6 Senior Interventional Cardiologist at Woodlands Hospital and Sri Aurobindo Seva Kendra in Kolkata, Kolkata, India
7 Consultant Interventional Cardiologist and Electrophysiologist, Frontier Lifeline Hospital, Chennai, India
8 Director and Head, Non-invasive Cardiology, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, Senior Consultant Cardiologist, India
9 Senior Consultant Cardiologist, Peerless Hospital and B K Roy Research Centre, Kolkata, India
10 Department of Medicine and Cardiology, Dr. D.Y Patil University, Navi Mumbai, India
11 Department of Cardiology, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India
12 Senior Consultant, Interventional Cardiologist, Apollo Hospitals, Bangalore, India
13 Senior Cardiologist, Interventional and Electrophysiology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
14 Non Interventional Cardiology, Fortis Escorts Heart Institute, New Delhi, India
15 Rtd. Professor and Head, Medical College, Kolkata, India
|Date of Submission||09-Apr-2020|
|Date of Decision||22-May-2020|
|Date of Acceptance||31-May-2020|
|Date of Web Publication||25-Sep-2020|
Dr. P B Jayagopal
Lakshmi Hospital, Chittur Road, Palakkad, Kerala 678 013
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Blood pressure (BP), even in healthy normotensive individuals, is dynamic, varies with a circadian periodicity, and is influenced by physiological and environmental factors. Abnormal 24-h BP patterns have been observed in many patients with hypertension (HTN), which may be overlooked if evaluations are based only on office BP measurements. Out of office BP measurements, such as Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Home Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM and HBPM) is important for optimal BP management and are better predictors of adverse outcomes. However, HTN diagnosis and management are often based on relatively few clinic BP measurements, and there are no recommendations to guide clinicians managing patients with abnormal 24-h BP patterns in India. Thus, the present consensus statement aims to provide uniform evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of abnormal 24-h BP patterns. Strategies for screening for HTN based on the current prevalence trends in India have been suggested. Further, recommendations on the appropriate use of ABPM and HBPM in diagnosis and management of HTN are provided.
Keywords: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure variability, home blood pressure monitoring, hypertension management, masked hypertension, morning surge, nocturnal hypertension, white-coat hypertension
|How to cite this article:|
Jayagopal P B, Srinivas B C, Raghu T R, Khanna N N, Srinivas K H, Manchanda S C, Guha S, Ray S, Thomas JM, Srivastava S, Roy DG, Shetty SR, Sathyamoorthy I, Ravindranath K S, Navasundi GB, Mantri R R, Jain P, Khan AK. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure management in India: A position statement by Indian College of cardiology. J Indian coll cardiol 2020;10:56-74
|How to cite this URL:|
Jayagopal P B, Srinivas B C, Raghu T R, Khanna N N, Srinivas K H, Manchanda S C, Guha S, Ray S, Thomas JM, Srivastava S, Roy DG, Shetty SR, Sathyamoorthy I, Ravindranath K S, Navasundi GB, Mantri R R, Jain P, Khan AK. Twenty-four-hour blood pressure management in India: A position statement by Indian College of cardiology. J Indian coll cardiol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 24];10:56-74. Available from: https://www.joicc.org/text.asp?2020/10/2/56/296119
| Introduction|| |
In healthy individuals, many biological processes such as heart rate and blood pressure (BP) display an endogenously regulated 24-h pattern, known as a circadian rhythm. Although the rhythmic changes in BP represent a normal physiological phenomenon, several reports have demonstrated that cardiovascular (CV) and cerebrovascular events occur with a circadian periodicity and coincide with the periods of elevated BP. Abnormal 24-h BP patterns are closely correlated with and have been shown to be an independent risk factor for mortality, CV events, and end-organ damage.,
Normal circadian rhythm of blood pressure
The rise (during the daytime) and the fall (during night-time) in BP levels over the 24-h period are generally synchronized with the body's sleep-wake cycle and help an individual to adapt to higher activity levels during wakefulness., The circadian pattern of BP is regulated by intrinsic neurohormonal mechanisms, primarily the sympathetic activity, and influenced by extrinsic factors such as physical activity, stress, stimulant or other medication use, light/dark cycle, and temperature. Other factors reported to regulate the 24-h BP pattern include the circadian rhythm-related hormones and regulatory mechanisms, pain modulators, and renal-hemodynamic effects.
It is well known that in normal healthy individuals, arterial BP is lower by ~10%–20% during sleep (at night-time), commonly referred as night-time BP dipping. The BP increases steadily during preawakening hours (typically between 3:00 am and 6:00 am) with a sudden and rapid elevation of up to 45 mmHg, upon awakening, a phenomenon known as the morning BP surge [Figure 1]. The timing of nocturnal BP dipping and morning surge may, however, vary depending on the individual's sleep-wake cycle. For example, in night-shift workers, the timing of “nocturnal” dipping and “morning” surge was shifted to synchronize with the sleep-wake cycle on the 1st day of the night shift.,
|Figure 1: Normal circadian rhythm of blood pressure. Figure represents the normal circadian pattern of blood pressure, i.e., changes in blood pressure observed in normotensive individuals over a 24-h period. The normal circadian pattern is characterized by a ~10%–20% dip in blood pressure at night-time (nocturnal dipping) followed by a sharp rise in blood pressure in the early morning hours (morning blood pressure surge), which typically coincides with the individual's time of awakening|
Click here to view
Adverse CV events that have been shown to coincide with the early morning surge, even among normotensive individuals, include sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarctions, angina pectoris, myocardial ischemia, and ischemic stroke.,, Meta-analyses, including >10,000 patients from studies that evaluated the timing of CV events, showed that the risk of sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and stroke events occurring in the morning (between 6:00 am to noon) was increased by 29%, 40%, and 49%, respectively, compared to the rest of the day.,, Night-time BP values are now recognized as an important aspect of the BP profile, and abnormal nocturnal dipping patterns are associated with increased risk of mortality and target organ damage., Further, BP is a dynamic variable that reflects the changes occurring in the body in response to internal (including physical, emotional, sleep, and neurohumoral) and environmental stimuli over seconds to years. These fluctuations in normal BP are referred to as BP variability (BPV), which is known to be an independent predictor of hypertensive target organ damage and CV events.,
Rationale and objectives
Currently, there is an established linear relationship between higher mean values of BP measured in office/clinical setting (office BP [OBP]) and worsening CV and renal outcomes; however, there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that out-of-office BP measurements (OOBPMs), using home BP monitoring (HBPM) and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) may be better predictors of morbidity and mortality associated with hypertension (HTN), compared to isolated OBPMs., Moreover, compared to normal ambulatory BP, elevated ambulatory 24-h BP values are reported to be more closely correlated with higher risk of new-onset HTN, diabetes, and CV events and an unfavorable metabolic profile. Abnormal BP patterns such as Exaggerated Morning Blood Pressure Surge (EMBPS) and lack of a normal nocturnal BP dip have been shown to be associated with increased incidence of stroke, heart failure, and other CV events. Further, BPV is also an independent source of prognostic information in hypertensive patients. The need for assessing BP variance becomes even more evident when analyzed in light of the fact that in some high-risk hypertensive patients, CV outcomes may not improve substantially even when mean BP values are maintained within physiological limits, using BP-lowering therapy. In addition, BPV may contribute to worsening end-organ damage and increased vascular events.,, Therefore, the management of BP should aim at controlling average 24-h BP levels, restoring a normal circadian rhythm with appropriate nocturnal dipping and morning BP surge, and decreasing variation of BP levels over time. There is also a need to assess population-specific BP variance as differences have been observed in the patterns of BP variance between Caucasians and non-Caucasians. Compared to Westerners, Asians show a greater surge in morning BP and a steeper slope, which could be a plausible risk factor for the higher number of strokes observed in this population.
Despite the current evidence indicating the importance of 24-h BP control for optimal management of HTN, diagnosis and treatment decisions are often based on relatively few OBPMs. Further, currently, in India, there is no specific recommendation/guidance to aid clinicians in managing patients with abnormal 24-h BP patterns. Thus, the present consensus statement aims to provide uniform evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and management of abnormal 24-h BP patterns. Strategies for screening for HTN based on the current prevalence trends in India have been suggested. Further, recommendations on the appropriate use of ABPM and HBPM in diagnosis and management of HTN are provided.
| Methodology|| |
The guidelines included in this consensus statement were developed based on the published evidence, current national and international guidelines, and experiential learning of the expert panel. Available evidence from randomized trials, observational studies, meta-analyses, and critical reviews was reviewed, and the current Indian Hypertension Guidelines (IHG)-IV, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension (ESC-ESH 2018), and the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Clinical Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA 2018) were also referred. A National Consensus Steering Committee that included 18 key experts and thought leaders met twice in Hyderabad, India, between June 2019 and August 2019 and corresponded frequently over e-mails and conference calls, to discuss the available evidence and get a consensus for the guidelines. In addition, five regional meetings were organized to get inputs from 30 experts, from various Indian states, who comprised the National Development Committee. Recommendations passed with unanimous consensus from the National Consensus Steering Committee were included.
An electronic literature search was conducted in the databases of MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. The search strategy was developed by combining Medical Subject Headings and free-text keywords using Boolean operators (“OR” and “AND”): (HTN OR hypertension OR blood pressure) AND (variation OR variability) AND (24*hour OR 24*h). Articles from all clinical studies, reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analysis were collected through June 2019, and no additional filters were used. The search was further intensified by performing a manual search of references from the relevant articles retrieved. As the primary goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of Indian patients, clinical data from studies conducted in the Indian population were given the highest priority. However, in case direct evidence from Indian studies were lacking, studies in the Asian populations were preferred as these may be relevant to Indian patients. Data from pertinent global studies were also included where appropriate.
The recommendations form a general guide to achieve 24-h BP control, especially in the Indian population. While treating an individual patient, the benefit–risk potential must be analyzed and the line of therapy should be administered based on involved decision-making with the patient.
| Screening for Hypertension and Hypertension-Related Complications|| |
According to the Global Burden of Disease study, the high prevalence of HTN and HTN-related morbidity and mortality is a cause for concern globally., The prevalence of HTN (including high morning BP surge and nocturnal HTN) and HTN-related CV diseases (CVDs) is higher in Asian populations than in Western populations. A systematic review of epidemiological studies in India has shown that the burden of HTN has been on the rise since the 1990s, with prevalence rates ranging from 25% to 42% in urban areas and 10% to 20% in rural areas.,,, Reports suggest an increase in the incidence of CVDs in India, which is primarily attributed to uncontrolled HTN., Further, an incremental trend in HTN prevalence has been observed among younger adults and in rural areas,, primarily attributed to rapid urbanization and the consequent lifestyle changes (e.g., sedentary lifestyle, high dietary salt intake, and consumption of high-sugar and high-fat diet) and increase in prevalence of obesity.,, A cause for greater concern is the fact that many patients with HTN remain uncontrolled despite treatment or are unaware of their condition.
The recent IHG-IV recognizes that HTN in India is characterized by few special features, such as an earlier onset, clustering of multiple CV risk factors, rising average BP in general population, significant seasonal variations, and low rates of awareness, treatment, and control. Therefore, HTN screening and treatment strategies should be designed considering these characteristics of HTN in India [Box 1].
HTN is an important risk factor for developing CVDs including coronary disease, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), valvular heart diseases, cardiac arrhythmias, stroke, and renal failure. In 2015, HTN led to 1.6 million deaths (>100% increase since 1990) and 33.9 million disability-adjusted life years in India., Early detection of CV complications could help prevent or delay adverse outcomes in patients with HTN. Patients with HTN and comorbid kidney disease often experience further progression of kidney disease; conversely, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) develop HTN and hence adverse outcomes at an earlier stage., It is recommended to screen for and initiate the management of renal complications early during the course of the disease in patients with HTN.
Early diagnosis is crucial for the management of BP, and timely intervention can help prevent or delay adverse outcomes. However, in addition to the growing burden of HTN, clinicians face several challenges in diagnosis and management of hypertensive patients in India:
- Lack of understanding/awareness regarding the condition among patients and caregivers
- Contemporary diagnostic techniques such as ABPM are not widely available or utilized
- There is a paucity of studies evaluating the prevalence and impact of various abnormal ambulatory BP patterns.
| Assessment of 24-H Blood Pressure|| |
Office blood pressure measurement
Rational management of HTN can be performed by accurate measurement of BP. In office setting, validated and standardized auscultatory or oscillometric semiautomatic or automatic sphygmomanometers are the preferred options for the measurement of BP. Use of mercury sphygmomanometers is not recommended due toxic effect of mercury on patients as well as the environment. The recommendations for appropriate measurement of BP in the clinic are summarized in [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Recommendations for office BP measurement. To obtain accurate BP measurements in office, patients should be asked to remain seated for at least 5–10 min before measurement of BP with a validated semiautomatic/automatic, auscultatory, or oscillometric sphygmomanometers. While taking the reading, patients should be seated with their back erect and supported, feet placed flat on the ground, and arms supported at heart level. An appropriate-sized cuff should be secured above the patient's elbow. The BP should be measured by a nurse, physician assistant, or other trained personnel. Take average of at least two readings measured 1–2 min apart. BP: Blood pressure|
Click here to view
Out-of-office blood pressure measurement
Although OBPM is a widely used and reliable method, it provides a single assessment under conditions that can influence the assessed parameter. Several international guidelines recommend the use of OOBPM, majorly advocating the complementary use of HBPM and ABPM.,,, The recommendations for BP measurement across Indian and international guidelines are summarized in [Table 1]. The current European and American guidelines as well as the IHG-IV recommend the use of OOBPM for diagnostic purposes.,, The use of HBPM, and ABPM if necessary, for diagnosing HTN, allows differentiation between patients with white-coat HTN (WCH), masked HTN (MH), or sustained HTN., The results from the recently concluded India ABPM Study showed that a large number of patients were unaware of their condition or had been misdiagnosed; these observations support the use of OOBPM in the diagnosis and management of HTN in India.
|Table 1: Blood pressure measurement-related recommendations across international guidelines|
Click here to view
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Ambulatory BP monitors allow the measurement of BP at regular intervals (~15–30 min) for a period of 24–48 h, providing accurate estimation of daytime and night-time BP. Few studies have also demonstrated 24-h ABPM to be more accurate than OBPMs in predicting CV morbidity and mortality.,, Further, elevation in the mean ambulatory 24-h BP is strongly associated with CV and stroke events. Owing to the greater number of readings, elimination of digit preference, and observer bias, ABPM offers a valuable tool for evaluating efficacy and response to drug treatment. Thus, ABPM serves as one of the best clinical tools to diagnose HTN and also predict organ damage.
The use of ABPM in the Indian population has been limited. ABPM was successfully performed in Indian children with CKD (n = 46). Similar to the published literature, there was a high prevalence of Ambulatory Hypertension, in 90% children on dialysis. Nocturnal Hypertension was especially prevalent in this study. Of note, although 74% of the study subjects were known to be hypertensive, ABPM revealed that almost half of them had inadequate BP control. The diagnosis of HTN was missed in seven out of 13 children with LVH when clinic BP alone was used to diagnose HTN, and HTN could be detected with ABPM. This study demonstrated that ABPM is feasible in the Indian setting and also contributes significantly to improve diagnosis and management of HTN. Recently, the India ABPM Study compared HTN diagnosis using OBPM and ABPM in 27,472 patients visiting primary care physicians. The results revealed that >30% of the participants had WCH or MH and were misdiagnosed if only OBPM was to be used. The evidence strongly supports the use of OOBPM for accurate HTN diagnosis in Indian patients [Box 2]/[Box 3]. The IHG-IV recommends the use of ABPM as it is a better predictor of CV events, although its application in routine practice may be limited due to the high cost.
Validated Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring devices are generally safe to use. Occasionally, petechiae of the upper arm or bruising under the inflating cuff may occur, and there may be sleep disturbances also. The parameters for assessing validity and limitations of ABPM are summarized in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: Indications, parameters for assessing validity, limitations|
Click here to view
Home blood pressure monitoring
The current Indian and international guidelines recommend the use of HBPM to measure BP at home to obtain reliable BP values.,,, It is a useful and dependable measure of BP, which can be used as an adjunct to the more common and standardized methods, such as OBPM and ABPM. The HBPM is also a useful and convenient tool for predicting target organ damage and CV mortality and events., Given that HBPM offers more accurate BP measurements over multiple days at relatively low cost, a recent consensus document developed by experts in HTN across India recommends HBPM for routine management of HTN. Further, the IHG-IV recommends using HBPM as a complimentary tool to clinic BP reading for diagnosis of HTN and follow-up. The limitations of HBPM are listed in [Table 3].
| Abnormal 24-H Blood Pressure Patterns|| |
Monitoring 24-h BP patterns helps identify specific forms of HTN, which may be broadly classified as daytime and night-time HTN. Isolated systolic, isolated diastolic, and systolic and diastolic HTN are the most commonly observed forms of daytime HTN. Other abnormal daytime BP patterns include WCH (characterized by elevated OBP/clinic systolic BP [SBP] ≥140 mmHg and/or ≥90 mmHg diastolic BP [DBP] with normal BP outside the clinic) and siesta dipping/postprandial hypotension. The clinical importance of night-time BP measurements (during sleep) is also well recognized.
Exaggerated morning blood pressure surge
Morning hours of the day is critical since most changes in the physiological system occur during this time, and major CV events, such as myocardial infarction, sudden death, or stroke, are more likely to occur during the early hours of the day, making monitoring of morning BP patterns extremely critical [Box 4]. An EMBPS is an indication of increased CV risk and target organ damage., Despite the surge in morning BP not being linearly associated to mean BP values, it is significantly related to an increase in the incidence of stroke. Further, the EMBPS is potentiated by synergistic resonance of different components of BPV, which are also considered responsible for the increased risk of CV events. Morning BP values monitored at 06:00 am have shown that variation in BP during the morning is associated with target organ damage and has a statistically significant correlation with left ventricular mass index, brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity, and carotid intima-media thickness (P < 0.001 for all), in addition to impact on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide urinary albumin: creatinine ratio (P < 0.01 for both).
In Japanese patients with HTN, sleep-trough morning BP surge (STMS) (≥55 mmHg) was associated with a 2.7 times increased incidence of stroke., In addition, patients with STMS (≥40 mmHg) were at a higher risk of all-cause mortality, and composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, and heart failure. Hypertensive patients with an STMS rate ≥11.3 mmHg/h were at a significantly high risk of all-cause mortality and CV mortality as compared with patients with an STMS rate of <11 mmHg/h (all-cause mortality: Heart Rate, 1.666; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.185–2.341; P = 0.0033; CV mortality: HR, 2.608; 95% CI, 1.554–4.375; P = 0.0003).
In addition to CV events, EMBPS is associated with complications among patients with diabetes. An Asian study evaluating the impact of EMBPS on diabetic patients from Iran showed that increased STMS was associated with neuropathy (0.023). Poor glycemic control and insulin resistance among diabetic patients are associated with EMBPS. A study including 122 patients with diabetes showed that 88.5% of the patients had EMBPS. The study further showed a negative correlation of EMBPS with flow-mediated dilation to a significant extent (P = 0.03).
Nocturnal dipping patterns: Extreme dipping, nondipping, and rising/reverse dipping
Nocturnal dipping phenomenon, defined as a decrease in night-time SBP of 10%–20% from daytime BP, represents a normal physiologic change. However, extreme dipping, nondipping, and rising or reverse dipping represent abnormal nocturnal BP patterns, which are associated with higher risk of stroke and CV events., The IHG-IV recommends OOBPM for evaluating abnormal nocturnal dipping BP patterns. The ratio of day-time and night-time BP that is used to define various nocturnal dipping patterns is described in [Table 4]. Abnormal nocturnal dipping patterns are also known to be associated with end-organ damage. Further, nondipping and sleep-related rising BP patterns are reported to be associated with increased all-cause mortality. An important finding from the India ABPM Study was that many patients (~12%) had isolated night-time HTN and most of these patients had normal 24-h ABPM values. Therefore, nocturnal BP should be evaluated and taken into considerations when managing Indian patients with HTN [Box 5].
|Table 4: Estimation of dipping pattern on the basis of daytime and night-time blood pressure values|
Click here to view
Obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by recurrent periods of complete or partial collapse of the upper airway during sleep, which leads to sleep disturbances. Elderly women, prehypertensive subjects, primary care patients, patients with a history of spinal cord injury and stroke are at a higher risk of experiencing concurrent OSA and HTN. The incidence of OSA is common among HTN patients, with prevalence rates of up to 14% reported in Indian patients with HTN. A questionnaire-based study conducted in the southern part of India reported that hypertensive patients were at a significantly high risk of experiencing OSA (odds ratio: 11, 95% CI: 4.3, 28.2).
In the presence of OSA, a rise in BP occurs due to sympathetic overactivity, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, endogenous vasoactive factors, and endothelial dysfunction. Exaggerated sympathetic activity among patients with OSA causes vasoconstriction, leading to HTN.,, Further, the presence of OSA among hypertensive patients is associated with CV events such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and arrhythmias.
Improvement in OSA outcomes such as breathing pause, tiredness after sleeping, wake time tiredness, snoring frequency, and snoring loudness has been reported in hypertensive patients with OSA treated with continuous positive airway pressure; however, the study did not evaluate the effect on BP. Considering that the management of HTN is challenging in patients with OSA, antihypertensive treatment is often not sufficient to control HTN among OSA patients [Box 6]. The use of continuous positive airway pressure ventilation has shown a positive impact and is recommended for the management of patients with OSA.,
| Blood Pressure Variability|| |
BPV is defined as the standard deviation (SD) or coefficient of variation of beat-to-beat BP obtained by intra-arterial monitoring for 24 h or noninvasive ABPM/HBPM achieved over a period., The BPV is associated with increased risks for CVD and target organ damage. Studies have shown that increased short-term (24-h BPV) and long-term BPV presents higher risk of CV events and target organ damage in hypertensive patients., Therefore, reduction of BPV offers a novel strategy for optimal HTN management and may prevent or delay progression of target organ damage [Figure 3] [Box 7].
|Figure 3: Therefore, reduction of BPV offers a novel strategy for optimal HTN management and may prevent or delay progression of target organ damage (Figure 3). ABPM: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, Arterial hypertension (AHT), BP: Blood pressure, BPV: Blood pressure variability, eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESRD: End-stage renal disease, HBPM: Home blood pressure monitoring|
Click here to view
Very short-term blood pressure variability
A beat-to-beat variability in BP is referred to as very short-term BPV. The primary mechanisms contributing to this are baroreceptor reflex and humoral response. The assessment of very short-term BPV requires continuous BP monitoring generally using a noninvasive finger cuff device equipped with an infrared photoplethysmograph. Although newer noninvasive devices are being developed that may facilitate measurement of beat-to-beat BPV in ambulatory patients, currently, this parameter is generally measured in laboratory setting only.
Short-term or 24-h blood pressure variability
The variations in BP that occur over 24 h in response to physical and emotional stimuli and sleep are termed as short-term BPV. Several mechanisms including neural, humoral, vascular, rheological, environmental, behavioral, and emotional contribute to 24-h BPV. Continuous monitoring by ABPM is used for assessing short-term BP fluctuations within a day (24 h).
Mid-term blood pressure variability
Mid-term BPV refers to day-to-day variations in BP, which was identified during HBPM studies and found to be associated with increased prevalence and severity of target organ damage and risk of fatal and nonfatal CV events.,, The results from the Ohasama Study and the Finn-Home Study suggest that day-to-day BPV has prognostic value and increased variability is associated with higher risk of CV events and mortality in patients with HTN., Day-to-day variations in BP can be assessed using HBPM, wherein BP is recorded over 5–7 days, or ABPM performed over 48 h.
Long-term blood pressure variability
BP fluctuations occurring over a longer period such as over months, from visit to visit, and seasonally are termed as long-term BPV. In addition to biological factors, long-term BPV is also influenced by behavioral factors as differences in fluctuations in BP are observed during weekdays and weekends. In addition, factors such as poor treatment compliance by the patient or improper dosing/titration of the antihypertensive medication by the physician might also influence long-term BPV. Errors in BP measurement may also contribute to visit-to-visit variability. Seasonal variations, summer versus winter, may be influenced by differences in temperature and daylight hours. Arterial stiffness, lower arterial elasticity, and reduced aortic dispensability may also contribute to long-term BPV. The HBPM can be used efficiently to measure day-to-day BPV. Visit-to-visit BPV assessment can be performed with repeated ABPM or HBPM.
Based on a meta-analysis, the preferred indices might include SD for the clinic, visit-to-visit and home BPV, and average real variability, or SD (the “weighted” SD) for 24-h BPV. Although the SD method is one of the most reliable one, monitoring the nocturnal and day-time BP for the mean BP should be done cautiously owing to the greater fall of BP during night. Further, indices unaffected by day-to-night changes, such as ARV or weighted 24-h SD, may be preferred for CV risk estimation.
| Masked and White-Coat Hypertension|| |
MH, defined as normal OBP readings (<140/90 mmHg) and consistently elevated average out-of-office readings (average daytime ambulatory BP ≥135/85 mmHg), remains under-treated if diagnosis is based only on OBP., There is a paucity of studies evaluating MH in India. Recently, the results from the large India ABPM Study were reported. In this study, OBPM and ABPM data were collected from >27,000 individuals visiting primary care physicians and nearly 20% of the participants were found to have MH. Similar prevalence rates for MH (19%) were observed in different regions in the India ABPM Study.
In treated patients, MH is referred to as masked uncontrolled HTN (MUCH). A prevalence of 32.1% MUCH was observed among treated HTN patients with well-controlled OBP. There is a lack of data on MUCH in India. In the Asia BP@Home Study, among 1443 treated patients with HTN, 9% were reported to have MUCH. The risk of target organ damage, CVD, CV-related mortality, stroke, and all-cause mortality in persons with MH or MUCH was shown to be equivalent to those with sustained HTN and greater than that in normotensive individuals and in those with WCH.,,,,,, A higher prevalence of MUCH in men and patients with smoking history, diabetes, obesity, and long duration of HTN has been observed. Furthermore, nocturnal high BP versus elevated daytime BP was most often attributable to the presence of MUCH.
An association between target organ damage leading to LVH, increased carotid intima media thickness and pulse wave velocity, and MH has been reported in the Finn-Home Study. High prevalence of MH (30%–60%), changes in 24-h BP profile, and impaired night dipping are reported in CKD patients. A prospective cross-sectional study conducted in children with stage 3 and 4 CKD (N = 46) in South India included ABPM assessment in addition to the casual BP. In this study, prevalence of confirmed HTN was 21.7%, MH was 19.6%, and LVH was 32.2%. An association between abnormal ABPM indices and the proportion of children with CKD with LVH was observed. In another study from India, when potential kidney donors were evaluated by ABPM, 11.2% were detected with MH (awake ABPM: >130/90 mmHg, nocturnal BP: >120/80 mmHg, and OBP: <140/90 mmHg).
Considering the high risk of CV, CKD, and target organ damage in these patients, decision regarding treatment regimens should be linked to the assessment of these diseases in individual patients. In addition, HBPM and ABPM should be utilized for early identification and diagnosis of MH [Box 8]. Although, the Finn-Home study suggested the superiority of HBPM to Clinic BP in predicting CVD risk, owing to the lack of night-time measurement, some MH patients could be misdiagnosed as normotensives. Viera et al. demonstrated a prevalence of 51% (95% CI = 39%–62%) for MH in individuals with office SBP of 110–119 mmHg and that of 80% for persons with office SBP of 120–129 mmHg and 130–139 mmHg; a similar trend was observed for DBP >80 mmHg. Although the cut-off of clinic SBP of 120 mmHg (and DBP 82 mmHg) was associated with the highest likelihood ratio of detecting MH, the false-positive rate (42%) was also high at this level. Hence, the decision to perform ABPM for patients with normal OBP should take into consideration the OBP level and other influencing factors.
Both the ACC-AHA 2017 and ESC-ESH 2018 guidelines recommend diagnosis of MH with HBPM that should be further confirmed by ABPM., However, conducting ABPM/HBPM in all patients with normal OBP for confirmation of risk of MH is not feasible; hence, a threshold level (SBP/DBP >120/80 mmHg) is desirable. In addition to the OBP level, the presence or risk of CV, renal complications, and target organ damage should be taken into consideration to determine the need for evaluating MH using OOBPM.
An elevated OBP measurement (OBPM, SBP ≥140/90 mmHg) in untreated individuals that is normal when measured by HBPM and ABPM is referred to as WCH.,, The same phenomenon in patients being treated with antihypertensives is referred to as white-coat effect. In the large population-based study in India, WCH was observed in 12% of the patients evaluated using clinic and OOBPM. In Western populations, a higher prevalence of WCH is reported among patients with high OBP (30%–40%) and among older people (>50%).,, The prevalence of WCH is higher with increasing age, female sex, nonsmokers, and in the presence of a clinician., In patients with white-coat effect, an OBP 10 mmHg above goal should be followed-up with screening for white-coat effect with HBPM or ABPM.
A conversion from WCH to sustained HTN by ABPM and HBPM is observed in 1%–5% individuals per year., Further, another study has suggested that WCH leads to increased risk of developing sustained HTN. A meta-analysis revealed that WCH was associated with a slight risk for CVD morbidity and mortality than normotensive persons, and this incidence of risk was lower than that observed in persons with sustained HTN. While some consider WCH to be a benign condition, a study demonstrated that persistent WCH seen in the clinic was associated with higher CV and all-cause mortality risk than normotensive individuals. Furthermore, an association of WCH for greater risk of developing conditions such as new-onset diabetes, clinic and ambulatory HTN, and LVH that increase CV risk has been observed., An increased incidence of dysmetabolic risk and subclinical organ damage has also been associated with WCH as compared with normotensive persons. Increased BPV has also been noted in patients with WCH., A prevalence of 30% white-coat effect has been observed in CKD patients. In a prospective, observational study conducted in patients with CKD attending nephrology clinic at a tertiary care center in India, a prevalence of 56.7% white-coat effect was observed when BP was measured by automated BP recorder.
Misdiagnosis and mistreatment of WCH can lead to chronic treatment with antihypertensives, which have considerable side effects and add to the costs. Therefore, confirmation of WCH and white coat effect with HBPM and/or ABPM is essential [Box 9]. Lifestyle changes and regular follow-ups with OOBPMs are recommended in individuals with WCH. Antihypertensive treatment (AHT) can be considered for WCH patients with greater CV risk, target organ damage, and abnormal OOBPMs or in those with persistent elevated BP.
Both the ACC 2017 and ESC 2018 have recommended that occurrence of MH and WCH should be investigated in patients with HTN and ABPM/HBPM should form the basis of therapeutic strategy decisions.,
| Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment of 24-H Blood Pressure|| |
Based on the current ESC/ESH and ACC/AHA guidelines , and the subsequent report by Wander and Ram, the present panel recommends initiating pharmacotherapy at 140/90 mmHg and at a lower threshold of 130/80 mmHg in high-risk patients. The recommended target BP is <130/80 mmHg for patients below 60 years and 130–140/80–90 mmHg in older patient (>60 years) [Box 10].
A chronotherapeutic approach is recommended to achieve optimal 24-h BP control. Key components of this approach include:
- Strategies to achieve sustained BP lowering over the 24-h period
- Maintain normal circadian BP pattern – appropriate morning BP surge and nocturnal dipping
- Strategies to decrease BPV
- Improving patient compliance.
Strategies for sustained blood pressure lowering over 24 h
Long-acting antihypertensive treatments
Agents with a longer half-life have a gradual onset and slower offset of action, resulting in an overall longer duration of action, which provides a greater therapeutic coverage. Thus, long-acting antihypertensive agents provide sustained BP lowering, even at the end of the dosing interval. The sustained activity over longer duration allows for once daily dosing and may offset loss of BP control in case of a missed dose., Further, once-daily dosing regimen is associated with increased adherence, which results in improved efficacy and long-term clinical outcomes. A comparison of the half-lives of available antihypertensive agents is presented in [Table 5]. Perindopril, telmisartan, amlodipine, bisoprolol, nebivolol, and chlorthalidone have the longest biological half-lives and hence may be preferred for achieving better 24-h BP control.
|Table 5: Comparison of half-lives and trough/peak ratio of different antihypertensive agents|
Click here to view
The trough-to-peak (T/P) ratio is an index of how well the antihypertensive effect is sustained over the dosing interval.
Antihypertensive agents with a T/P ratio closer to 100% show more uniform BP-lowering effect over the 24-h period. The T/P ratios for commonly available antihypertensive agents are presented in [Table 5]. Candesartan, telmisartan, perindopril, amlodipine, and nebivolol have the highest T/P ratios and hence may be preferred for achieving better 24-h BP control.
Maintaining normal circadian rhythm
There is a paucity of Indian studies evaluating EMBPS and nocturnal HTN; hence, the recommendations are based on studies in Asian populations, where available, or global studies.
Choosing an antihypertensive agent to control exaggerated morning blood pressure surge
Although the routine OBP appears to be controlled with conventional AHT, morning BP remains uncontrolled in many patients. Further, intensive therapy with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or diuretic administered in the morning or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) administered in the evening effectively reduced morning BP. Thus, for achieving 24-h BP control, it is important to evaluate and manage EMBPS. One of the strategies to control EMBPS is using long-acting agents with high T/P ratio that provide 24-h coverage and hence lower the morning surge. Studies show that different long-acting agents may have varying effect on 24-h BP. Amlodipine and telmisartan have been shown to better control EMBPS when compared to valsartan., An alternative approach is to use chronotherapeutic regimens with extended-release formulations and/or night-time dosing to effectively lower EMBPS. Further, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) has a physiologic influence on morning BP surge; hence, RAAS blockers may be effective in controlling EMBPS., Finally, in some cases, EMBPS may be attributed to treatment noncompliance; therefore, agents with a once-daily dosing regimen, which are associated with improved treatment compliance, should be preferred.
Strategies to address nocturnal hypertension
Kario reviewed the current evidence for management of 24-h BP and suggested that lowering nocturnal BP is critical for achieving good BP control over 24 h. Patients should be evaluated for identifying uncontrolled nocturnal HTN (night-time BP >110/85 mmHg) after achieving morning home BP <130/80 mmHg. Dietary salt restriction and treatment with diuretics or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists effectively reduce BP in patients with increased circulating volume. On the other hand, CCBs, either as monotherapy or in combinations with RAAS blockers, are beneficial for patients with advanced vascular disease. Further, timing of drug dosing may also play an important role in controlling nocturnal BP.
Results from the MAPEC trial showed that patients taking antihypertensive medication at bed-time have lower mean night-time BP, despite similar 24-h ambulatory BP, compared with those on morning dosing., Further, chronotherapeutic regimes are associated with reduced risk of adverse CV events and target organ damage, including in patients with renal dysfunction and diabetes and elderly patients. Several studies and a systematic review that evaluated the effect of time of administration of antihypertensive drug (morning vs. evening) suggest that CCBs and diuretics should be administered in the morning, while evening dosing may be preferred for RAAS blockers and beta-blockers.,,
Management of patients with blood pressure variability
In the Syst-Eur study, treatment with the CCB, nitrendipine, resulted in a modest but significant reduction in SD of both day-time (−1.5 mmHg) and night-time average SBP (1.1 mmHg). Nitrendipine did not affect the coefficient of variation. In the landmark ASCOT-BPLA study, Visit to Visit Variability (VVV) was significantly lower and also decreased over time, with amlodipine treatment versus atenolol. Further, this lower inter-individual VVV with amlodipine treatment was associated with a reduced risk of stroke and vascular events. The beneficial effect of amlodipine treatment on BPV has been reported in randomized trials, including the large ALLHAT study involving 24,004 hypertensive patients., A retrospective study that compared BPV among hypertensive patients treated with amlodipine versus other CCBs in China showed that the patients in amlodipine group had better BPV control (diff [95% CI]: 0.86 [−1.26 to − 0.47], P < 0.05) as compared with other CCBs. A study, comparing the effect of amlodipine versus valsartan on 24-h ambulatory BPV in treatment-naïve HTN patients in Japan, reported superior 24-h BPV control with amlodipine (including reduced maximum values of daytime and night-time SBP and DBP).
In the X-CELLENT study, antihypertensive therapy with the long-acting diuretic, indapamide sustained release, was shown to significantly reduce VVV in SBP when compared to placebo or candesartan. In the ALLHAT study, treatment with chlorthalidone showed similar reduction in VVV as observed with amlodipine over a period of 28 months.
In a randomized trial that evaluated the effect of four beta-blockers on BPV, treatment with beta-blockers significantly reduced ambulatory day-time BP but increased coefficient of BP variation., A systematic review of the effect of various AHTs on BPV showed that while CCBs and diuretics reduced BPV, treatment with beta-blockers increased BPV in a dose-dependent manner.
Choosing antihypertensive treatment based on available evidence
Efficacy and safety of most currently available antihypertensive agents have been evaluated in randomized controlled clinical studies. The benefits of different classes of antihypertensive agents with regard to 24-h BP control are summarized in [Table 6]. A summary of landmark trials by antihypertensive drug class is presented in [Table 7].
|Table 7: Landmark trials for different classes of antihypertensive drugs|
Click here to view
Combination therapy for 24-h blood pressure management
Most patients with HTN require combination therapy with ≥2 agents to achieve sustained BP control. Current guidelines recommend initiating antihypertensive therapy with a combination of two drugs, either two separate pills or a fixed-dose single-pill combination, in patients with stage ≥2 or resistant HTN.,, Combination therapy with a single-pill combination may improve speed, efficiency, and predictability of BP control. Further, initial low-dose combination therapy may be more effective and preferred over high-dose monotherapy.,
It is reported that combination therapy with a CCB and an ARB or diuretic is significantly more effective in reducing BPV than other antihypertensive combinations. Further, the combination of long-acting drugs, such as telmisartan-amlodipine, seems useful to buffer excessive BP fluctuations over a 24 h period, with their administration being characterized by the highest rating in the smoothness index.,, Further, CCBs, as monotherapy or in combination with ARB, are more effective for daytime BP control while diuretics, both as monotherapy and in combination with ARB, are effective for reducing nocturnal BP., Thus, the preferred two-drug combinations include a RAAS blocker and CCB or diuretic., The combination of two RAAS blockers (e.g., telmisartan and ramipril) is not recommended as this is associated with increased adverse events without an increase in benefit as observed in the ONTARGET study. A beta-blocker may be considered in a two-drug combination therapy regimen when there is a specific indication for beta-blocker use (e.g., angina, postmyocardial infarction, heart failure, or increased heart rate).
In nearly one-third of patients, BP remains uncontrolled despite treatment with two-drug combination therapy, and further, uptitration of treatment is required. In such patients, preferred three-drug combination comprises a RAAS blocker, a CCB, and diuretic., Spironolactone may be added to other antihypertensive agents in patients with resistant HTN, if not contraindicated.
The authors thank members of the National Development Committee for their invaluable inputs
National Development Committee
Dr. Kajal Ganguly, Dr. Kartik Vasudevan, Dr. P. S. Mohanamurugan, Dr. P. Harikrishnan, Dr. Madanmohan, Dr. Manokar, Dr. T. R. Muralidharan, Dr. Krishna Moorthy, Dr. K. P. Pramod Kumar, Dr. Bhaskar Shah, Dr. Mukesh Parikh, Dr. Hetan Shah, Dr. Vidya Suratkal, Dr. Harish Bajaj, Dr. Akshay Mehta, Dr. Nirmal Jain, Dr. V. T. Shah, Dr. Ashok Punjabi, Dr. M. Vishwanathan, Dr. Dhiren Shah, Dr. Kaushal Chatrapati, Dr. Ripen K. Gupta, Dr. Amar Singhal, Dr. V. K. Chopra, Dr. Aseem Dhall, Dr. Sibananda Dutta.
Writing assistance was provided by Jyothi Ramanathan, PhD, and additional editorial support was provided by Sangita Patil, PhD, CMPP (both SIRO Clinpharm Pvt. Ltd., Thane, India). We thank Dr. Mohammed Yunus Khan Hukkeri (Dr. Reddy's Laboratories) for providing valuable inputs additional guidance and editorial support during the development of this manuscript.
Financial support and sponsorship
Funding for this position statement was provided by Dr. Reddy's Laboratories.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Redon J. The normal circadian pattern of blood pressure: Implications for treatment. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 2004;145:3-8.
Aung K, Htay T. Relationship between outpatient clinic and ambulatory blood pressure measurements and mortality. Curr Cardiol Rep 2019;21:28.
Banegas JR, Ruilope LM, de la Sierra A, Vinyoles E, Gorostidi M, de la Cruz JJ, et al
. Relationship between clinic and ambulatory blood-pressure measurements and mortality. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1509-20.
Koroboki E, Manios E, Psaltopoulou T, Vemmos K, Michas F, Alexaki E, et al
. Circadian variation of blood pressure and heart rate in normotensives, white-coat, masked, treated and untreated hypertensives. Hellenic J Cardiol 2012;53:432-8.
Kumar A, Kalmath BC, Abraham G, Christopher J, Kaparthi P, Fischer L, et al
. Role and relevance of blood pressure variability in hypertension related co-morbidities. J Assoc Physicians India 2017;65:83-92.
Smolensky MH, Hermida RC, Portaluppi F. Circadian mechanisms of 24-hour blood pressure regulation and patterning. Sleep Med Rev 2017;33:4-16.
Hassler C, Burnier M. Circadian variations in blood pressure: Implications for chronotherapeutics. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005;5:7-15.
Sundberg S, Kohvakka A, Gordin A. Rapid reversal of circadian blood pressure rhythm in shift workers. J Hypertens 1988;6:393-6.
Kanth R, Ittaman S, Rezkalla S. Circadian patterns of ST elevation myocardial infarction in the new millennium. Clin Med Res 2013;11:66-72.
Kario K. Morning surge and sleep surge in blood pressure – New clinical insights. Nihon Rinsho 2011;69:1950-7.
Zhang H, Cui Y, Zhao Y, Dong Y, Wang J, Duan D, et al
. Association of circadian rhythm of blood pressure and cerebral small vessel disease in community-based elderly population. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019;74:1322-30.
Cohen MC, Rohtla KM, Lavery CE, Muller JE, Mittleman MA. Meta-analysis of the morning excess of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1512-6.
Elliott WJ. Circadian variation in the timing of stroke onset: A meta-analysis. Stroke 1998;29:992-6.
Kollias A, Ntineri A, Stergiou GS. Association of night-time home blood pressure with night-time ambulatory blood pressure and target-organ damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2017;35:442-52.
O'Brien E, Parati G, Stergiou G, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al
. European society of hypertension position paper on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 2013;31:1731-68.
Kamide K, Kabayama M. Implications of blood pressure variations in older populations. Hypertens Res 2019;42:19-25.
Stevens SL, McManus RJ, Stevens RJ. The utility of long-term blood pressure variability for cardiovascular risk prediction in primary care. J Hypertens 2019;37:522-9.
Parati G, Ochoa JE, Salvi P, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Prognostic value of blood pressure variability and average blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension and diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013;36 Suppl 2:S312-24.
Dadlani A, Madan K, Sawhney JP. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in clinical practice. Indian Heart J 2019;71:91-7.
Mancia G, Verdecchia P. Clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure: Evidence and limits. Circ Res 2015;116:1034-45.
White WB. Importance of blood pressure control over a 24-hour period. J Manag Care Pharm 2007;13 8 Suppl B: 34-9.
Wong ND, Dede J, Chow VH, Wong KS, Franklin SS. Global cardiovascular risk associated with hypertension and extent of treatment and control according to risk group. Am J Hypertens 2012;25:561-7.
Sethi BK, Baruah MP, Kumar AS. Blood pressure variability in patients with diabetes mellitus with hypertension: Treatment recommendations and role of amlodipine. J Assoc Physicians India 2017;65:67-71.
Chenniappan M. Blood pressure variability: Assessment, prognostic significance and management. J Assoc Physicians India 2015;63:47-53.
Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, et al
. Prognostic significance of visit-to-visit variability, maximum systolic blood pressure, and episodic hypertension. Lancet 2010;375:895-905.
Kario K. Evidence and perspectives on the 24-hour management of hypertension: hemodynamic biomarker-initiated 'anticipation medicine' for zero cardiovascular event. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2016;59:262-81.
(API), A.o.P.o.I., Indian guidelines on hypertension-IV 2019. J Assoc Physicians India 2019;67 Suppl: 1-46.
Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al
. 2018 Practice Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press 2018;27:314-40.
Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr., Collins KJ, Himmelfarb CD, et al
. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018;71:e13-115.
Jagannathan R, Patel SA, Ali MK, Narayan KMV. Global updates on cardiovascular disease mortality trends and attribution of traditional risk factors. Curr Diab Rep 2019;19:44.
Forouzanfar MH, Liu P, Roth GA, Ng M, Biryukov S, Marczak L, et al
. Global burden of hypertension and systolic blood pressure of at least 110 to 115 mm Hg, 1990-2015. JAMA 2017;317:165-82.
Sogunuru GP, Kario K, Shin J, Chen CH, Buranakitjaroen P, Chia YC, et al
. Morning surge in blood pressure and blood pressure variability in Asia: Evidence and statement from the HOPE Asia Network. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019;21:324-34.
Roy A, Praveen PA, Amarchand R, Ramakrishnan L, Gupta R, Kondal D, et al
. Changes in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment and control rates over 20 years in National Capital Region of India: Results from a repeat cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e015639.
Gupta R, Ram CV. Hypertension epidemiology in India: Emerging aspects. Curr Opin Cardiol 2019;34:331-41.
Anchala R, Kannuri NK, Pant H, Khan H, Franco OH, Di Angelantonio E, et al
. Hypertension in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension. J Hypertens 2014;32:1170-7.
Gupta R, Gaur K, Venkata C, Ram S. Emerging trends in hypertension epidemiology in India. J Hum Hypertens 2018;33:575-87.
Wander GS, Ram CV. Global impact of 2017 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Hypertension Guidelines: A perspective from India. Circulation 2018;137:549-50.
Dalal J, Sethi KK, Kerkar PG, Ray S, Guha S, Hiremath MS. Vascular disease in young Indians (20-40 years): Role of hypertension. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:OE01-6.
Gupta R. Convergence in urban-rural prevalence of hypertension in India. J Hum Hypertens 2016;30:79-82.
Balsari S, Vemulapalli P, Gofine M, Oswal K, Merchant R, Saunik S, et al
. A retrospective analysis of hypertension screening at a mass gathering in India: Implications for non-communicable disease control strategies. J Hum Hypertens 2017;31:750-3.
Kjeldsen SE, Stenehjem A, Os I, Van de Borne P, Burnier M, Narkiewicz K, et al
. Treatment of high blood pressure in elderly and octogenarians: European Society of Hypertension statement on blood pressure targets. Blood Press 2016;25:333-6.
GBD 2017 Risk Factor Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2018;392:1923-94.
Gupta R, Xavier D. Hypertension: The most important non communicable disease risk factor in India. Indian Heart J 2018;70:565-72.
Ravera M, Re M, Deferrari L, Vettoretti S, Deferrari G. Importance of blood pressure control in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006;17:S98-103.
Drawz PE, Alper AB, Anderson AH, Brecklin CS, Charleston J, Chen J, et al
. Masked hypertension and elevated nighttime blood pressure in CKD: Prevalence and association with target organ damage. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016;11:642-52.
Gopalakrishnan N, Abraham G. Management of hypertension in chronic kidney disease: Consensus statement by an expert panel of indian nephrologists. J Assoc Physicians India 2017;65 2 Suppl: 6-22.
Stergiou GS, Kyriakoulis KG, Kollias A. Office blood pressure measurement types: Different methodology-different clinical conclusions. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018;20:1683-5.
NICE. Hypertension in Adults: Diagnosis and Management – NICE Guideline [NG136]; 2019.
Kaul U, Arambam P, Rao S, Kapoor S, Swahney JPS, Sharma K, et al.
Usefulness of ambulatory blood pressure measurement for hypertension management in India: The India ABPM study. J Hum Hypertens 2019 Dec;21(12):1784-1794.
Grossman E. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Diabetes Care 2013;36 Suppl 2:S307-11.
Hansen TW, Kikuya M, Thijs L, Björklund-Bodegård K, Kuznetsova T, Ohkubo T, et al
. Prognostic superiority of daytime ambulatory over conventional blood pressure in four populations: A meta-analysis of 7,030 individuals. J Hypertens 2007;25:1554-64.
Hara A, Tanaka K, Ohkubo T, Kondo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, et al
. Ambulatory versus home versus clinic blood pressure: The association with subclinical cerebrovascular diseases: The Ohasama Study. Hypertension 2012;59:22-8.
Staessen JA, Li Y, Hara A, Asayama K, Dolan E, O'Brien E. Blood pressure measurement Anno 2016. Am J Hypertens 2017;30:453-63.
Gupta D, Chaturvedi S, Chandy S, Agarwal I. Role of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children with chronic kidney disease. Indian J Nephrol 2015;25:355-61.
] [Full text]
Parati G, Stergiou G, O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Bilo G, et al
. European Society of Hypertension practice guidelines for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Hypertens 2014;32:1359-66.
Fujiwara T, Yano Y, Hoshide S, Kanegae H, Kario K. Association of cardiovascular outcomes with masked hypertension defined by home blood pressure monitoring in a Japanese general practice population. JAMA Cardiol 2018;3:583-90.
Chiriacò M, Pateras K, Virdis A, Charakida M, Kyriakopoulou D, Nannipieri M, et al
. Association between blood pressure variability, cardiovascular disease and mortality in type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:2587-98.
Shetty S0, et al
. Expert group, home based blood pressure monitoring in Indian Setting: A consensus document. J Clin Diagn Res 2018;12: OA01-4.
Chia YC, Buranakitjaroen P, Chen CH, Divinagracia R, Hoshide S, Park S, et al
. Current status of home blood pressure monitoring in Asia: Statement from the HOPE Asia Network. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:1192-201.
O'Brien E, Kario K, Staessen JA, de la Sierra A, Ohkubo T. Patterns of ambulatory blood pressure: Clinical relevance and application. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018;20:1112-5.
Bilo G, Grillo A, Guida V, Parati G. Morning blood pressure surge: Pathophysiology, clinical relevance and therapeutic aspects. Integr Blood Press Control 2018;11:47-56.
Wanthong S, Kabutoya T, Hoshide S, Buranakitjaroen P, Kario K. Early morning-Best time window of hourly 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure in relation to hypertensive organ damage: The Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019;21:579-86.
Kario K, Pickering TG, Umeda Y, Hoshide S, Hoshide Y, Morinari M, et al
. Morning surge in blood pressure as a predictor of silent and clinical cerebrovascular disease in elderly hypertensives: A prospective study. Circulation 2003;107:1401-6.
Hoshide S, Cheng HM, Huang Q, Park S, Park CG, Chen CH, et al
. Role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for the management of hypertension in Asian populations. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:1240-5.
Cheng HM, Wu CL, Sung SH, Lee JC, Kario K, Chiang CE, et al
. Prognostic utility of morning blood pressure surge for 20-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortalities: Results of a community-based study. J Am Heart Assoc 2017;6:e007667.
Najafi MT, Khaloo P, Alemi H, Jaafarinia A, Blaha MJ, Mirbolouk M, et al
. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and diabetes complications: Targeting morning blood pressure surge and nocturnal dipping. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018;97:e12185.
Nuthalapati RK, Indukuri BR. Association between glycemic control and morning blood surge with vascular endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2016;20:182-8.
Sheppard JP, Hodgkinson J, Riley R, Martin U, Bayliss S, McManus RJ. Prognostic significance of the morning blood pressure surge in clinical practice: A systematic review. Am J Hypertens 2015;28:30-41.
Yan B, Sun L, Gao Y, Guo Q, Guo L, Wang X, et al
. Blood pressure reverse dipping may associate with stable coronary artery disease in patients with essential hypertension: A cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2016;6:25410.
Cuspidi C, Sala C, Tadic M, Gherbesi E, De Giorgi A, Grassi G, et al
. Clinical and prognostic significance of a reverse dipping pattern on ambulatory monitoring: An updated review. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:713-21.
Ben-Dov IZ, Kark JD, Ben-Ishay D, Mekler J, Ben-Arie L, Bursztyn M. Blunted heart rate dip during sleep and all-cause mortality. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:2116-21.
Cai A, Wang L, Zhou Y. Hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertens Res 2016;39:391-5.
Konecny T, Kara T, Somers VK. Obstructive sleep apnea and hypertension: An update. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) 2014;63:203-9.
Sharma SK, Kumpawat S, Banga A, Goel A. Prevalence and risk factors of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in a population of Delhi, India. Chest 2006;130:149-56.
Pinto AM, Devaraj U, Ramachandran P, Joseph B, D'Souza GA. Obstructive Sleep Apnea in a rural population in South India: Feasibility of health care workers to administer level III sleep study. Lung India 2018;35:301-6.
] [Full text]
Furlan SF, Braz CV, Lorenzi-Filho G, Drager LF. Management of hypertension in obstructive sleep apnea. Curr Cardiol Rep 2015;17:108.
Pedrosa RP, Drager LF, Gonzaga CC, Sousa MG, de Paula LK, Amaro AC, et al
. Obstructive sleep apnea: The most common secondary cause of hypertension associated with resistant hypertension. Hypertension 2011;58:811-7.
Kapa S, Kuniyoshi FH, Somers VK. Sleep apnea and hypertension: Interactions and implications for management. Hypertension 2008;51:6058.
Vijayan VK. Morbidities associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Expert Rev Respir Med 2012;6:557-66.
Arya D, Singh SV, Tripathi A, Tripathi SK. A pilot study to compare patient perception of obstructive sleep apnea treatment with CPAP or appliance therapy. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1188-93.
Parati G, Lombardi C. Control of hypertension in nonsleepy patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:650-2.
Parati G, Lombardi C, Hedner J, Bonsignore MR, Grote L, Tkacova R, et al
. Recommendations for the management of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension. Eur Respir J 2013;41:523-38.
Parati G, Ulian L, Santucciu C, Tortorici E, Villani A, Di Rienzo M, et al
. Clinical value of blood pressure variability. Blood Press Suppl 1997;2:91-6.
Sega R, Corrao G, Bombelli M, Beltrame L, Facchetti R, Grassi G, et al
. Blood pressure variability and organ damage in a general population: Results from the PAMELA study (Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni). Hypertension 2002;39:710-4.
Hocht C. Blood pressure variability: Prognostic value and therapeutic implications. ISRN Hypertens 2013;2013:16.
Parati G, Ochoa JE, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:143-55.
Matsui Y, Ishikawa J, Eguchi K, Shibasaki S, Shimada K, Kario K. Maximum value of home blood pressure: A novel indicator of target organ damage in hypertension. Hypertension 2011;57:1087-93.
Kikuya M, Ohkubo T, Metoki H, Asayama K, Hara A, Obara T, et al
. Day-by-day variability of blood pressure and heart rate at home as a novel predictor of prognosis: The Ohasama study. Hypertension 2008;52:1045-50.
Johansson JK, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Jula AM. Prognostic value of the variability in home-measured blood pressure and heart rate: The Finn-Home Study. Hypertension 2012;59:212-8.
Parati G, Liu X, Ochoa JE, Bilo G. Prognostic relevance of blood pressure variability: Role of long-term and very long-term blood pressure changes. Hypertension 2013;62:682-4.
Stevens SL, Wood S, Koshiaris C, Law K, Glasziou P, Stevens RJ, et al
. Blood pressure variability and cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2016;354:i4098.
Bilo G, Giglio A, Styczkiewicz K, Caldara G, Maronati A, Kawecka-Jaszcz K, et al
. A new method for assessing 24-h blood pressure variability after excluding the contribution of nocturnal blood pressure fall. J Hypertens 2007;25:2058-66.
Parati G, Ochoa JE, Bilo G. Blood pressure variability, cardiovascular risk, and risk for renal disease progression. Curr Hypertens Rep 2012;14:421-31.
Parati G, Ochoa JE, Bilo G. White coat and masked hypertension in chronic kidney disease: Importance of the difference between office and out-of-office blood pressure measurements. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e012299.
Pierdomenico SD, Cuccurullo F. Prognostic value of white-coat and masked hypertension diagnosed by ambulatory monitoring in initially untreated subjects: An updated meta analysis. Am J Hypertens 2011;24:52-8.
Viera AJ, Hinderliter AL, Kshirsagar AV, Fine J, Dominik R. Reproducibility of masked hypertension in adults with untreated borderline office blood pressure: Comparison of ambulatory and home monitoring. Am J Hypertens 2010;23:1190-7.
Naser N, Dzubur A, Durak A, Kulic M, Naser N. Blood pressure control in hypertensive patients, cardiovascular risk profile and the prevalence of masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH). Med Arch 2016;70:274-9.
Kario K, Tomitani N, Buranakitjaroen P, Chia YC, Park S, Chen CH, et al
. Home blood pressure control status in 2017-2018 for hypertension specialist centers in Asia: Results of the Asia BP@Home study. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018;20:1686-95.
Fagard RH, Cornelissen VA. Incidence of cardiovascular events in white-coat, masked and sustained hypertension versus true normotension: A meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2007;25:2193-8.
Ohkubo T, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Asayama K, Obara T, Hashimoto J, et al
. Prognosis of “masked” hypertension and “white-coat” hypertension detected by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring 10-year follow-up from the Ohasama study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:508-15.
Stergiou GS, Asayama K, Thijs L, Kollias A, Niiranen TJ, Hozawa A, et al
. Prognosis of white-coat and masked hypertension: International Database of HOme blood pressure in relation to Cardiovascular Outcome. Hypertension 2014;63:675-82.
Palla M, Saber H, Konda S, Briasoulis A. Masked hypertension and cardiovascular outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Integr Blood Press Control 2018;11:11-24.
Liu JE, Roman MJ, Pini R, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG, Devereux RB. Cardiac and arterial target organ damage in adults with elevated ambulatory and normal office blood pressure. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:564-72.
Sega R, Trocino G, Lanzarotti A, Carugo S, Cesana G, Schiavina R, et al
. Alterations of cardiac structure in patients with isolated office, ambulatory, or home hypertension: Data from the general population (Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni [PAMELA] Study). Circulation 2001;104:1385-92.
Hänninen MR, Niiranen TJ, Puukka PJ, Kesäniemi YA, Kähönen M, Jula AM. Target organ damage and masked hypertension in the general population: The Finn-Home study. J Hypertens 2013;31:1136-43.
Kanakaraj A, Ravichandran R. Prevalence of masked hypertension among kidney donors. Indian J Nephrol 2012;22:398.
] [Full text]
Niiranen TJ, Hänninen MR, Johansson J, Reunanen A, Jula AM. Home-measured blood pressure is a stronger predictor of cardiovascular risk than office blood pressure: The Finn-Home study. Hypertension 2010;55:1346-51.
Viera AJ, Lin FC, Tuttle LA, Shimbo D, Diaz KM, Olsson E, et al
. Levels of office blood pressure and their operating characteristics for detecting masked hypertension based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am J Hypertens 2015;28:42-9.
Mancia G, Bombelli M, Brambilla G, Facchetti R, Sega R, Toso E, et al
. Long-term prognostic value of white coat hypertension: An insight from diagnostic use of both ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements. Hypertension 2013;62:168-74.
Gorostidi M, Vinyoles E, Banegas JR, de la Sierra A. Prevalence of white-coat and masked hypertension in national and international registries. Hypertens Res 2015;38:1-7.
Franklin SS, Thijs L, Asayama K, Li Y, Hansen TW, Boggia J, et al
. The cardiovascular risk of white-coat hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:2033-43.
Piper MA, Evans CV, Burda BU, Margolis KL, O'Connor E, Whitlock EP. Diagnostic and predictive accuracy of blood pressure screening methods with consideration of rescreening intervals: A systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:192-204.
Bidlingmeyer I, Burnier M, Bidlingmeyer M, Waeber B, Brunner HR. Isolated office hypertension: A prehypertensive state? J Hypertens 1996;14:327-32.
Briasoulis A, Androulakis E, Palla M, Papageorgiou N, Tousoulis D. White-coat hypertension and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2016;34:593-9.
Mancia G, Facchetti R, Grassi G, Bombelli M. Adverse prognostic value of persistent office blood pressure elevation in white coat hypertension. Hypertension 2015;66:437-44.
Mancia G, Bombelli M, Cuspidi C, Facchetti R, Grassi G. Cardiovascular risk associated with white-coat hypertension: Pro side of the argument. Hypertension 2017;70:668-75.
Fukuhara M, Arima H, Ninomiya T, Hata J, Hirakawa Y, Doi Y, et al
. White-coat and masked hypertension are associated with carotid atherosclerosis in a general population: The Hisayama study. Stroke 2013;44:1512-7.
Gijón-Conde T, Graciani A, López-García E, Guallar-Castillón P, García-Esquinas E, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, et al
. Short-term variability and nocturnal decline in ambulatory blood pressure in normotension, white-coat hypertension, masked hypertension and sustained hypertension: A population-based study of older individuals in Spain. Hypertens Res 2017;40:613-9.
Kang IS, Pyun WB, Shin J, Ihm SH, Kim JH, Park S, et al
. Higher blood pressure variability in white coat hypertension; from the Korean ambulatory blood pressure monitoring registry. Korean Circ J 2016;46:365-73.
Minutolo R, Agarwal R, Borrelli S, Chiodini P, Bellizzi V, Nappi F, et al
. Prognostic role of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in patients with nondialysis chronic kidney disease. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1090-8.
Shenoy S, Nagaraju SP, Rau NR, Prabhu RA, Mateti UV, Rangaswamy D, et al
. Prevalence and clinical correlates of white coat effect in patients with chronic kidney disease and the role of automated blood pressure device in its assessment. Indian J Nephrol 2018;28:448-53.
] [Full text]
Wander GS, Ram CV. Optimal blood pressure goals recommended by the latest hypertension guidelines: India may benefit the most. Eur Heart J 2018;39:3012-6.
Meredith PA. A chronotherapeutic approach to effective blood pressure management. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2002;4 4 Suppl 1:15-9.
Gosse P. A review of telmisartan in the treatment of hypertension: Blood pressure control in the early morning hours. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2006;2:195-201.
Wang JG, Kario K, Lau T, Wei YQ, Park CG, Kim CH, et al
. Use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in the management of hypertension in Eastern Asians: A scientific statement from the Asian Pacific Heart Association. Hypertens Res 2011;34:423-30.
Flack JM, Nasser SA. Benefits of once-daily therapies in the treatment of hypertension. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2011;7:777-87.
Elliott HL. Trough: Peak ratio and twenty-four-hour blood pressure control. J Hypertens Suppl 1994;12:S29-33.
Kuriyama S, Otsuka Y, Iida R, Matsumoto K, Tokudome G, Hosoya T. Morning blood pressure predicts hypertensive organ damage in patients with renal diseases: Effect of intensive antihypertensive therapy in patients with diabetic nephropathy. Intern Med 2005;44:1239-46.
Pedersen OL, Mancia G, Pickering T, Høegholm A, Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, et al
. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring after 1 year on valsartan or amlodipine-based treatment: A VALUE substudy. J Hypertens 2007;25:707-12.
White WB, Lacourciere Y, Davidai G. Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan on the circadian variation of blood pressure: Impact on the early morning period. Am J Hypertens 2004;17:347-53.
Patel PV, Wong JL, Arora R. The morning blood pressure surge: Therapeutic implications. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2008;10:140-5.
Lacourcière Y, Neutel JM, Davidai G, Koval S. A multicenter, 14-week study of telmisartan and ramipril in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am J Hypertens 2006;19:104-12.
Eguchi K, Kario K, Shimada K. Comparison of candesartan with lisinopril on ambulatory blood pressure and morning surge in patients with systemic hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2003;92:621-4.
Kario K. Perfect 24-h management of hypertension: Clinical relevance and perspectives. J Hum Hypertens 2017;31:231-43.
Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Mojón A, Fernández JR. Influence of circadian time of hypertension treatment on cardiovascular risk: Results of the MAPEC study. Chronobiol Int 2010;27:1629-51.
Vernon G. The chronotherapy of hypertension: Or the benefit of taking blood pressure tablets at bedtime. Br J General Pract 2017;67:171-1.
Hermida RC, Ayala DE, Fernández JR, Mojón A, Crespo JJ, Ríos MT, et al
. Bedtime blood pressure chronotherapy significantly improves hypertension management. Heart Fail Clin 2017;13:759-73.
Vij R, Peixoto AJ. Management of nocturnal hypertension. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009;7:607-18.
Carter BL, Chrischilles EA, Rosenthal G, Gryzlak BM, Eisenstein EL, Vander Weg MW. Efficacy and safety of nighttime dosing of antihypertensives: Review of the literature and design of a pragmatic clinical trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2014;16:115-21.
Zhao P, Xu P, Wan C, Wang Z. Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 201; 5:CD004184.
Floras JS. Blood pressure variability: A novel and important risk factor. Canadian J Cardiol 2013;29:557-63.
Rothwell PM, Howard SC, Dolan E, O'Brien E, Dobson JE, Dahlöf B, et al
. Effects of beta blockers and calcium-channel blockers on within-individual variability in blood pressure and risk of stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010;9:469-80.
Muntner P, Levitan EB, Lynch AI, Simpson LM, Whittle J, Davis BR, et al
. Effect of chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril on visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure: Results from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2014;16:323-30.
Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Safar ME, Blacher J. Effect of antihypertensive agents on blood pressure variability: The Natrilix SR versus candesartan and amlodipine in the reduction of systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients (X-CELLENT) study. Hypertension 2011;58:155-60.
Zhang L, Yang J, Li L, Liu D, Xie X, Dong P, et al
. Comparison of amlodipine versus other calcium channel blockers on blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients in China: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis. J Comp Eff Res 2018;7:651-60.
Eguchi K, Imaizumi Y, Kaihara T, Hoshide S, Kario K. Comparison of valsartan and amlodipine on ambulatory blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients. Clin Exp Hypertens 2016;38:721-4.
Floras JS, Hassan MO, Jones JV, Osikowska BA, Sever PS, Sleight P. Factors influencing blood pressure and heart rate variability in hypertensive humans. Hypertension 1988;11:273-81.
Webb AJ, Rothwell PM. Effect of dose and combination of antihypertensives on interindividual blood pressure variability: A systematic review. Stroke 2011;42:2860-5.
Wald DS, Law M, Morris JK, Bestwick JP, Wald NJ. Combination therapy versus monotherapy in reducing blood pressure: Meta-analysis on 11,000 participants from 42 trials. Am J Med 2009;122:290-300.
Levi-Marpillat N, Macquin-Mavier I, Tropeano AI, Parati G, Maison P. Antihypertensive drug classes have different effects on short-term blood pressure variability in essential hypertension. Hypertens Res 2014;37:585-90.
Parati G, Dolan E, Ley L, Schumacher H. Impact of antihypertensive combination and monotreatments on blood pressure variability: Assessment by old and new indices. Data from a large ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database. J Hypertens 2014;32:1326-33.
Parati G, Schumacher H. Blood pressure variability over 24 h: Prognostic implications and treatment perspectives. An assessment using the smoothness index with telmisartan-amlodipine monotherapy and combination. Hypertens Res 2014;37:187-93.
Parati G, Schumacher H, Bilo G, Mancia G. Evaluating 24-h antihypertensive efficacy by the smoothness index: A meta-analysis of an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring database. J Hypertens 2010;28:2177-83.
Kario K. Proposal of RAS-diuretic vs. RAS-calcium antagonist strategies in high-risk hypertension: Insight from the 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profile and central pressure. J Am Soc Hypertens 2010;4:215-8.
ONTARGET Investigators, Yusuf S, Teo KK, Pogue J, Dyal L, Copland I, et al
. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1547-59.
Chen BL, Zhang YZ, Luo JQ, Zhang W. Clinical use of azelnidipine in the treatment of hypertension in Chinese patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2015;11:309-18.
Kurtz TW, Kajiya T. Differential pharmacology and benefit/risk of azilsartan compared to other sartans. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2012;8:133-43.
Wang HY, Wang CF, Pan ZH, Wu H, Zhong Y, Chen XC, et al
. Efficacy and safety of benidipine therapy of essential hypertension in elderly Chinese patients. Arzneimittelforschung 2008;58:505-9.
Dolan E, O'Brien E. Blood pressure variability. Hypertension 2010;56:179-81.
Myers MG, Leenen FH, Burns R, Frankel D. Nifedipine tablet vs. hydralazine in patients with persisting hypertension who receive combined diuretic and beta-blocker therapy. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1986;39:409-13.
Matsui Y, O'Rourke MF, Hoshide S, Ishikawa J, Shimada K, Kario K. Combined effect of angiotensin II receptor blocker and either a calcium channel blocker or diuretic on day-by-day variability of home blood pressure: The Japan Combined Treatment With Olmesartan and a Calcium-Channel Blocker Versus Olmesartan and Diuretics Randomized Efficacy Study. Hypertension 2012;59:1132-8.
Wang JG, Kario K, Chen CH, Park JB, Hoshide S, Huo Y, et al
. Management of morning hypertension: A consensus statement of an Asian expert panel. J Clin Hypertens 2018;20:39-44.
Svensson P, de Faire U, Sleight P, Yusuf S, Ostergren J. Comparative effects of ramipril on ambulatory and office blood pressures: A HOPE Substudy. Hypertension 2001;38:E28-32.
PROGRESS Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of a perindopril-based blood-pressure-lowering regimen among 6,105 individuals with previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 2001;358:1033-41.
Gosse P, Schumacher H. Effect of telmisartan vs. ramipril on 'dipping' status and blood pressure variability: Pooled analysis of the PRISMA studies. Hypertens Res 2014;37:151-7.
Bang LE, Wiinberg N, Wachtell K, Larsen J, Olsen MH, Tuxen C, et al
. Losartan versus atenolol on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure. A LIFE substudy. Blood Press 2007;16:392-7.
Izzo JL Jr, Jia Y, Zappe DH. Influence of age and race on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure responses to valsartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination: Implications for clinical practice. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2017;19:143-50.
Kario K, Tomitani N, Kanegae H, Ishii H, Uchiyama K, Yamagiwa K, et al
. Comparative Effects of an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB)/Diuretic vs. ARB/Calcium-Channel Blocker Combination on Uncontrolled Nocturnal Hypertension Evaluated by Information and Communication Technology-Based Nocturnal Home Blood Pressure Monitoring- The NOCTURNE Study. Circ J 2017;81:948-57.
Pareek AK, Messerli FH, Chandurkar NB, Dharmadhikari SK, Godbole AV, Kshirsagar PP, et al
. Efficacy of low-dose chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide as assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:379-89.
London G, Schmieder R, Calvo C, Asmar R. Indapamide SR versus candesartan and amlodipine in hypertension: The X-CELLENT Study. Am J Hypertens 2006;19:113-21.
DiNicolantonio JJ, Bhutani J, Lavie CJ, O'Keefe JH. Evidence-based diuretics: Focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide. Future Cardiol 2015;11:203-17.
Weber MA, Sica DA, Tarka EA, Iyengar M, Fleck R, Bakris GL. Controlled-release carvedilol in the treatment of essential hypertension. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:32L-38L.
Yang T, Jiang Y, Hao Y, Zhou S, Xu X, Qu B, et al
. Comparison of bisoprolol to a metoprolol CR/ZOK tablet for control of heart rate and blood pressure in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients: The CREATIVE study. Hypertens Res 2017;40:79-86.
de la Sierra A, Armario P, Oliveras A, Banegas JR, Gorostidi M, Vinyoles E, et al
. Antihypertensive drug use in resistant and nonresistant hypertension and in controlled and uncontrolled resistant hypertension. J Hypertens 2018;36:1563-70.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7]